🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has maintained a prohibition on sending state troops in Portland, Oregon, after a recent legal decision.

Judicial Panel Agrees to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on this week that it would reexamine the legal dispute concerning the president’s authority with an larger group of 11 judges. The court also vacated a previous ruling from a smaller judicial group that had sided with the federal government.

Legal Saga Over Troop Deployment

This legal directive represents the latest turn in a protracted court case over whether the administration has the legal right and valid reason to deploy national guard forces in the city. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in limbo since late September when the deployment effort was started in response to months of protests.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has argued that government employees at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were under attack, while local authorities assert that municipal police have control of the situation.

In defiance of descriptions of the city as “war ravaged”, residents have been sharing footage of lush hiking trails and a vibrant culinary culture, and organizing events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the increased military presence.

Recent Legal Actions

The Tuesday ruling came after a US district judge in Portland enacted two legal injunctions this month – one preventing the federal control of the state troops, and another prohibiting the deployment of any national guard troops in Oregon, after attempts to circumvent the first order by calling up out-of-state forces.

On the previous day, the ninth circuit panel had temporarily suspended the initial decision – permitting control of 200 Oregon national guard – but the second ruling remained in place, blocking the actual deployment of the troops.

Full Panel Consideration

The latest ruling means the issue will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under review together – by a panel of eleven justices.

“This decision demonstrates that the truth matters and that the judicial system are working to ensure government responsibility. The constitution limits the executive authority, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for expansive government power,” stated the state attorney general in a statement.

“The judicial body is sending a definite signal: the executive leader cannot dispatch the military into US cities without cause. We will continue protecting state legislation, values, and autonomy as this legal proceeding progresses and our fight continues in the courts.”